In the least-surprising-sequel category, a sequel 2009’s blockbuster hit The Hangover finishes only slightly behind the eighth Harry Potter movie. A comedy doesn’t make half-a-billion dollars these days without a sequel. The Hangover, Part II is a sequel like Escape from L.A. is a sequel: That is to say, almost a remake.
I thought the first was over-rated. I enjoyed it, but it’s not on my list of greatest comedies. (It was in my top 45 movies for 2009.) This movie looks to be under-rated. Again, I enjoyed it, but it’s not actually going to be on my list of greatest comedies. (And it’ll probably make the top 45 cut for 2011.)
You can read an Ace of Spades mega-review here. I have a lot less to say. I had about the same sporadic chuckling throughout this as the last one. I enjoy Ed Helms’ character and performance tremendously, and he’s got quite a niche as a sort of nerd-plus (see Cedar Rapids). He takes center stage from the too-cool Bradley Cooper and the mostly-idiot-but-savant-when-the-plot-requires Zach Gallafianikis. Newcomer Mason Lee has a small but pivotal role in the story which makes it a little “nicer”.
The chemistry seems better this time. Characters recur from the original, sometimes in a good way, sometimes in a gimmicky way.
It is more vulgar, darker and has a hint of ominousness to it not in the original. Also: a monkey.
What I’m gathering is that people who loved the original were somewhat disappointed by this. If you just liked the original, you’ll probably just like this, too.
In any event, you know if you want to see this based on how you felt about the original. (I guess you’d miss out a bit if you haven’t seen the original first, but not that much.)
The Boy was not displeased.
If I had a gripe, it’s probably that this movie was called “Part II”. As if the first left so many unanswered questions, they had to give us closure. It’s not a “Part II” guys. It’s not even a “II”. It’s just a “2”. Deal.